Concerned
Friends likes ‘spirit of Act’ but
question how changes will be funded
Friday, January 19, 2007
-- Natalie Miller
While she embraces the resident-focused ‘spirit’
of the Province’s proposed Long Term Care
Homes Act, Lois Dent wonders where the dollars
will come from to fund the changes.
“We are quite supportive of the
legislation,” says Dent, president of the
board of directors of Concerned Friends of Ontario
Citizens in Care Facilities.
“We are very happy with the spirit
of the Act.”
Dent highlights the resident-focused
components of the Act including the strengthened
bill of resident rights, the detailed provisions
on prevention of abuse and neglect and the piece
dealing with restricted use of restraints. She
points also to the portion that provides family
councils “with a number of powers they can
use.” Concerned Friends piloted the idea
of family councils in long-term care homes.
Founded in 1980, Concerned Friends
of Ontario Citizens in Care Facilities is a non-profit
corporation and registered charity dedicated to
reform of the long-term care system and improvement
of quality of life for residents.
While the Act generally looks good
on paper “there’s nothing in the Act
about how this is going to be paid for,”
Dent says. “There are a lot of obligations
put on (long-term care operators). They’re
going to need increased funding to provide the
care required if this Act is passed.”
When asked if Concerned Friends takes
issue with the licencing component of the Act,
which gives government the power to limit the
duration and revoke licences of older homes, she
says, “It’s a bit of a red herring.”
She says governments rarely close homes, even
those homes that aren’t delivering good
care. That said, Dent notes, “I do agree
with the need to fund a capital renewal program.”
Another issue raised by long-term care
providers is the increased processes and paperwork
outlined in the Act. But Dent says this is necessary.
“I know there are a lot of good homes out
there but it needs to be in there because there
will always be a need in the poorly-run homes
for this clout to make them do what needs to be
done to provide proper care. Those are the ones
we hear about. We do hear some horror stories.
They are the minority but to the person involved,
it can’t be overlooked.”
The Long Term Care Homes Act 2006 or
Bill 140 is currently at the second reading stage.
According to the Province, the proposed Act promotes
zero tolerance of abuse and neglect of long-term
care home residents, restricts the use of restraints
and makes it mandatory a registered nurse be on
duty in the province’s nursing homes 24
hours a day, seven days a week. It also defines
licence terms for long-term care homes of up to
25 years and provides the authority to revoke
licences in cases of non-compliance.
Concerned Friends addressed the provincial
Standing Committee on Social Policy earlier this
week during one of the five public hearings on
the proposed legislation.
|