Analysis
There’s a leadership role for long-term
care in communities
Monday April 28, 2003 Roderick
Benns
PETERBOROUGH A long-term care home is part of a community, but does
it contribute to community? This is perhaps the overriding question based
upon a recent series of interviews with OMNI’s administrators,
now grouped online entitled ‘A
Look Ahead.’ In this
series each administrator was contacted and asked how they felt their
home was positioned in the community, now and for the year ahead. They
identified their priorities in a year that will be like no other in the
sector.
A glut of long-term care beds blankets the province,
resulting in the supply of beds outstripping demand. Nursing education
has been turned
upside down, because academic expectations now involve more years of
study. At the same time, too few nurses compete for the same full-time
jobs. It’s a tightrope of growing proportions but it is a walk
that many administrators seem sure-footed enough to take up the challenge
and think outside of the long-term care box.
In fact, eight out of 16 OMNI administrators saw their home
as part of an organic community picture, a gestalt in a sector often
identified
with its challenges. This indicates an emerging movement that could set
OMNI on a path that will separate it even more from its competitors.
For instance, Toni Surko, administrator of Almonte Country
Haven, saw her long-term care home as a place for all seniors in the
community – a
potential haven, even for those seniors who had no connection
to the home or to OMNI. From Almonte’s fitness programs to its
pastoral services, Toni envisioned her home as an integral part of the
community, not an individual ‘thing’ merely taking up square
footage in the town.
Administrator Sue Matwey of Riverview Manor in Peterborough saw a strong
role for her home to play in Peterborough, a good force that must develop
community partnerships.
Nelly Hobbs, administrator of Rosebridge Manor, says she would like
to see her home do more presentations with a variety of community partners,
particularly in the psycho-geriatric vein for which Rosebridge is building
a reputation upon.
Seeing one's home as contributing to an entire community
through an active involvement with community partners serves to promote
necessary values
and secure necessary connections. It is perhaps yet one more way for
OMNI to lead the sector. In fact, if fully half of OMNI’s administrators
are already on board with such a theory, surely it represents opportunity
that has already started to take form.
Imagine the potential for the breaking down of stereotypes about long-term
care, as homes educate individuals and community partners and learn,
in turn, from those same allies. Imagine the myths and perceptions
that will be dispelled in long-term care when the creation of social
capital confronts the reality of social need.
Does this conceptual framework for OMNI homes address the realties of
recruitment and retention or the concerns over occupancy? Certainly not.
These are areas in which every OMNI home has to be cognizant of. But
helping to define community is an umbrella goal that administrators have
identified. Again, it has the potential to set OMNI apart from its long-term
care peers.
In the coming weeks we will investigate existing linkages
between OMNI homes and their natural community partners, as well as
endeavour to plant
the seeds of future links. Perhaps we shall discover there will be relationships
to be built that do not fall under the so-called ‘natural’ partnership
framework.
In any event, it may soon be difficult to argue that a long-term care
home is an island unto itself. Instead, it may more properly show itself
to be a community oasis that will nourish those who experience its friendly,
outstretched hand.
|